Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 3

Terrorism - Essay Example Motivations and goals of terrorists vary widely. They vary from grand schemes to aims that are more distinct. The grand schemes include activities like the total remaking of a society along fundamental religious or doctrinaire ideological lines and the fulfillment of divinely inspired millenarian imperatives. The more distinct aims include unification of undivided states to the reestablishment of national homelands. Nevertheless, issue-specific causes such as animal rights, banning of abortion or other environmental concerns still motivates some terrorists. These individuals seek to apply direct pressure on the public and the government. The pressure is meant to make the legislators enact or repeal legislations that directly affect the terrorists’ particular interest. Despite the differences that exist between the different terrorist groups, the one thing that they have in common is that the actions they commit are not senseless or random. All the terrorists’ desire is for their actions to receive as much publicity as possible and aims at subjection and intimidation to attain their objectives. Hoffman argues that â€Å"Terrorists seek to impress. All the actions they perform are a play to and for a specific audience for the solicitation of the audience’s participation (Hoffman 173).’ Some like-minded individuals carry out their initiatives knowing that people will assume that they are Muslims. These individuals take advantage of the simplicity of undertaking terror attacks in order to achieve maximum damage and publicity.

Narrative criticism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Narrative criticism - Essay Example es of narrative criticism have emerged; some people have claimed that narrative criticism is a fundamental tool in communication processes owing to the fact that it facilitates the understanding of texts and how they reflect on human life structures, thus creating a platform for information sharing and exchange (Pullman, 7). As a method of literary analysis, this approach has been a subject of negative and positive criticism. To begin with, some scholars have claimed that the application narrative criticism is majorly based on a dimension of literary analysis that allows readers to assess literary works in a holistic manner, by noting different characteristics and styles that are similar to other literary works, taking into consideration, the beginning, middle as well as the end (Powell, 3). On the other hand, some narrative critics have asserted that it is basically a method that does not focus on a holistic analysis of literary works, but rather focus on specific elements of literary works, which seem relevant to the story line or the main theme. Moreover, this group of critics has claimed the narrative criticism is a basic tool for literary analysis that engages its readers through understanding how the literary works relate with real life experiences (Byron, 13). This is usually achieved through various points of view passed by the narrators and relating them to the real life experiences of its readers. According to Allan Powell (1990), Narrative criticism can be considered a function of events. This is because in its application, a high sense of priority is given to the text from the ideas of ‘implied readers’ and ‘implied author’: The essence of implied author as well as implied reader are usually determined by signatures emerging from the text. Powell also asserts that narrative criticism is a function of events, basically due to the fact that it involves taking into consideration characters and settings of a literary analysis that forms its